Data analysis
⚙️ CRITERION B: DATA ANALYSIS (6 marks total)
This section focuses on how well you record, process, and analyze the data you’ve collected, especially in terms of clarity, uncertainty treatment, and accuracy.
✅ 1. Clarity and Precision in Communication
Your data tables, graphs, and calculations must be:
-
Clearly presented
-
Neatly organized
-
Labeled properly
-
Easy to follow
✔️ What to Do:
-
Use consistent units and significant figures.
-
Label all tables (e.g. “Table 1: Time for 10 pendulum oscillations at various lengths”) and all graphs (with axes labeled and units).
-
Include headings, titles, and legends where needed.
-
Make sure everything is logically arranged.
🧠 Example:
| Length of Pendulum (m) | Time for 10 Oscillations (s) | Period (s) | Uncertainty in (s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.40 | 12.67 | 1.27 | ± 0.03 |
| 0.50 | 14.21 | 1.42 | ± 0.03 |
Graph: Period vs. √Length, with error bars and a best-fit line.
✅ 2. Consideration of Uncertainties
This is where you show your understanding of experimental uncertainty—an essential part of physics.
✔️ What to Do:
-
Include uncertainties in all measurements (e.g., ±0.01 m).
-
Use proper error propagation in calculated values (add, subtract, multiply, divide).
-
Show how you calculated uncertainties (e.g. range/2 for repeated trials or based on instrument precision).
-
Include error bars on graphs if applicable.
🧠 Example:
Uncertainty in length: Meter ruler precision is ±0.001 m
Uncertainty in time: Based on stopwatch reaction time (±0.2 s), average over 10 oscillations to reduce error
Propagation: T=t/10, so ΔT=Δt/10
On Graph: Use vertical error bars to reflect uncertainty in period.
✅ 3. Accuracy in Data Processing
Your calculations must be:
-
Mathematically correct
-
Relevant to your research question
-
Reflect a good understanding of the physics involved
✔️ What to Do:
-
Show sample calculations clearly with all steps, units, and significant figures.
-
Use appropriate mathematical models, such as linear regression, logarithmic fits, or theoretical formulas.
-
Use software or tools for precision (Excel, LoggerPro, Desmos, GeoGebra, etc.), but explain what you did.
-
If you’re comparing theoretical vs. experimental values, calculate percentage error.
🧠 Example:
Sample Calculation:
✅ 4. Types of Data
You should present:
-
At minimum, quantitative data (numbers you measured or calculated)
-
You may also include qualitative data (observations, patterns, visual cues), but it must support the quantitative analysis
✔️ What to Do:
-
Collect measurable quantities (mass, time, force, voltage, etc.)
-
Add brief observations if helpful (e.g., “At larger angles, the pendulum’s motion became less regular.”)
-
Make sure your data is relevant to your RQ
🧠 Example:
-
Quantitative: “Measured voltage across the resistor at 5 different current values.”
-
Qualitative: “The resistor warmed slightly at higher currents, which may affect resistance.”
✅ Summary Checklist for Criterion B
| Element | Have You… | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Clear Data Tables | Used clear labels, units, and correct sig figs? | “Length (m), Time (s), Uncertainty (s)” |
| Graphs | Labeled axes, used error bars, and best-fit lines? | T vs. √L with regression line |
| Uncertainties | Shown how you calculated and propagated them? | “ΔT = Δt / 10” |
| Sample Calculations | Clearly, shown steps with units? | “T = t / 10 = 1.42 ± 0.02 s” |
| Quantitative Data | Measured relevant values with precision? | Time, current, voltage, etc. |
| Optional Qualitative Data | Included relevant observations? | “Pendulum started twisting at longer lengths.” |

